Locations for photography: the Lofoten Islands, Norway
To avoid any doubt introduced by the scant mention of negatives below…
I’m loath to be too gushing (just on general principle!) but Lofoten is unequivocally a fabulous place to visit in winter, both from a photographic and from a purely sight-seeing point of view. I’ve just returned from my first trip there and I think it highly likely that I’ll return one day, perhaps in summer, but more probably in winter again.
I feel I should start off by ‘confessing’ that, until about a year ago, I’d not knowingly heard of Lofoten! I’d travelled in Norway before, pretty much the length of it, but that was a long time ago and we drove around ‘seeing what happened’… What happened was that we missed one of the best bits – perhaps the best bit! Now, everyone I mention Lofoten to seems to have either heard of it or actually been there, so it’s rather less obscure than I’d imagined.
Where and what it is
For that tiny minority of people reading this who aren’t intimately acquainted with the location and topography of this string of islands: they’re towards the north of Norway, inside the Arctic Circle, and tenuously connected to the mainland by a series of bridges and undersea tunnels.
For context, I flew into Leknes, which is a little over an hour by road, or approximately 70Km, from the southern tip of the islands at Å (pronounced something like ‘awe’, and, appropriately, the last letter of the Norwegian alphabet). This area is essentially the southern half of the string of islands called, collectively, Lofoten. This isn’t intended as a place name list, and there are many sites which describe what’s where and how it’s strung together, so I’ll stop there! (For anyone feeling pedantic when reading this, the little archipelago of Røst is really the end, but there’s a lot of water between it and the ‘main’ Lofoten archipelago, so I’m choosing to see Å as ‘the end’ ;-) )
In appearance, the best analogy I’ve come up with for Lofoten is that of a somewhat broken up series of giant Toblerone bars, with the tops of the triangles protruding from the Norwegian Sea and their sides plummeting straight down into it. There is not an awful lot of flat land in Lofoten; just triangular mountains and water. I’ll concede that the Toblerone analogy suggests a regularity which is fortunately not evident, but it does nicely indicate the angle and overall, pointy ‘nothing here but mountains’ nature of the place!
Mountains in most places rise gradually; these don’t. Many of them look as if a monolithic troll with a meat cleaver and a penchant for triangles has taken a perfectly normal mountain and fashioned something sharp and tooth-like from it with a couple of slanting blows. I’ve seen a great many mountains, and these are, especially collectively, radically different from most. Not that they’re very high – something in the region of 400-800m., but that does look big when seen from sea level and when they tend to be much closer to vertical than to horizontal!
Logistically and photographically
Conveniently, where the land does approach the horizontal – and there are some areas between the peaks where this happens – the inhabitants have laced the edges of the fjords with roads which lead to numerous sandy beaches and rocky shelves. And therein lies both a huge plus point to the islands and a slight downside, depending on your point of view.
So, from my perspective:
- On the positive side, getting around is easy; if slow on occasion. There’s a particular fjord on the main, E10 road, where a bridge has not yet been built across its mouth, making an 800 metre potential crossing into a 13 minute (yes, on about the fifth occasion, I timed it…) circuit of the fjord; but then, it’s a spectacular circuit! Even in winter, and in what I was told was an especially snowy time, all the roads, including the minor roads to dead ends at beaches, appeared to be regularly ploughed, and were certainly drivable with winter tyres.
- The result of this excellent road network – and I emphasise that it may be ‘just me’ who sees a negative here – is that this is far, far from being a wilderness. I didn’t expect it to be, but I was surprised at just how copious the habitation and general signs of human activity are. This area is now, and has long been, extensively used for fishing, somewhat unsurprisingly – and it’s also beautiful. The natural consequences of these two things are lots of fishing infrastructure and at least a few, and often a collection, of houses on most accessible, flat areas. For example, looking at my image ‘Apostrophe’, from my previous post, you can just see, right in the centre of it, a small building…
That second point is a quibble, however; just something to be aware of when setting expectations for yourself before travelling there. Personally, I rather like just turning up in places and learning about them as I find them, rather than doing lots of research beyond the more or less essential ‘how to get there and how to get around’ sort. And the big benefit of the buildings is that, with very few exceptions, they’re pretty and can be used constructively in images.
Consistently and photogenically colourful
Each village / town / collection of houses decrees the one or more colours in which its buildings can be painted. We’re not just talking ‘red’ or ‘orange’ here – they prescribe a specific red and/or a specific orange, or whatever other colour(s) the settlement has chosen for itself. This means that each inhabited area has its own character imprinted by the single or multiple colours of its buildings. The result can be remarkably picturesque. I have no idea what the penalties for non-compliance are, but from the evidence I saw, people most certainly do comply. Reine, where I was based, has a mixture of a rather dramatic, strong red, a deep orange, and cream; in its winter garb of snow it looks thoroughly delightful and offers huge potential for dramatic, contextual, or simply pretty images.
On the importance of snow
Snow is far from guaranteed in Lofoten, yet it is, I think, a very important aspect of visiting in winter. I’m not being facetious here: yes, it’s the Arctic, but snow is not omnipresent on the islands during the winter months since the Gulf Stream keeps things warmer than the inland, classically Arctic areas to the east. It’s rather similar to the way that the Black Cuillin of Skye are rarely in what mountaineers call ‘winter condition’.
As it was described to me, the snow can be around for a week or so, then disappear, only to be replaced a few days later. The day before I arrived, there was apparently no snow at all, whereas every day I was there brought fresh snow. In fact, it was more like every night, which was rather convenient for freshening things up :-)
Photographically, I believe the snow is very important, probably more so than in many places. The reason for that is the nature of the mountains. They’re very old, hard, dark rock; that’s how they survive this hostile environment and remain jagged and angular. With snow on them, the major features are picked out superbly as their steepness provides snow-free areas to contrast with the white. Many of my images show the mountains looking more like finely drawn pencil sketches than ‘normal’ mountains – an effect I very much like and one which absolutely depends on the crystalline covering.
Without the snow cover, my conviction is that the darkness of the rock would make dragging detail of shape and texture from the faces more than a little difficult. I’ve spoken to a few people about this, as well as looked at summer images, and it’s a conviction with some credibility I feel!
From bonsai landscapes to big vistas
The effect of this on my photography was that I was always drawn to the ‘big vista’ images showing these amazing, sketch-like mountains: I have relatively few detail shots. Yes, I did attempt some ‘fence in snow’ images and some ‘snow-covered tree’ images, but all that achieved was even more respect for people, like Michael Kenna, who can construct brilliant images from such stark simplicity! My feeling is that summer would be a better time – at least for me – to make ‘intimate landscape’ images. More than that, I suspect that the black, relatively featureless nature of the mountains would make this compositional choice almost inevitable.
Perhaps a week of primarily vistas is no bad thing, though after my very enjoyable focus on relative, sometimes scale-free, detail in the US deserts – my ‘bonsai landscapes’ trip! – I’m almost distressed at the number of shots I captured in Lofoten with both sky and several miles of landscape from corner to corner! That’s in part since I wasn’t inspired to photograph the buildings very much.
There’s a pre-visualisation lesson there I think: since I hadn’t pre-visualised images with buildings, I wasn’t drawn to them initially. In fact, as I said above, the colourful buildings against the snow, particularly the deep red ones, make very striking images indeed and those few I do have, I’m very pleased with.
OK – I confess to being very, very impressed with Lofoten…
In summary then, having intended not to write an entirely gushing article, and having read through it now, I acknowledge that I really was hugely enthused by Lofoten! Those minor issues I did have (human presence essentially – the lack of wilderness) can be seen as positive and as opportunities for different types of image; they can also be largely avoided by taking advantage of the surprisingly good infrastructure, visiting the more remote beaches, and examining what’s in the distance carefully!
Oh! I should not omit mentioning what I’m told is a considerable additional, albeit non-photography, benefit of visiting in winter.
- The main industry is fishing, with the second, I presume, being tourism, and that largely in summer.
- The fish are exported dried, having been hung on large racks for non-trivial amounts of time to dessicate.
- These racks are ubiquitous in the settlements.
- If you like the smell of fish, that would be a good thing…. personally, I don’t.
Fortunately, in winter, despite there being tens of thousands of drying fish everywhere – probably hundreds of thousands; a lot, anyway! – the aroma is only apparent close up, as a result of the cold. I imagine this is not true in summer: the fish bodies are taken down in June, but the heads take longer to dry; so winter gets yet another positive tick from me ;-)
By the way, the gallery images below seem to be much better than the embedded versions – I allowed WordPress to size and resample these. And if anyone has any detailed questions about where things are, etc. please do feel free to ask – I’m more than happy to help whilst I can still remember!
25 Responses to “Locations for photography: the Lofoten Islands, Norway”
Thanks Mike for an interesting and informative read, and a great set of images.
Thanks for taking the time to comment, Pete :-) Some of those will be appearing on Flickr in the not too distant future of course.
Great read as always Mike, & some really interesting images, sounds like you had a thoroughly enjoyable trip.
Thanks, Dave. Yes, it was an excellent week!
Great stuff Mike…A wonderful place so well described and captured. I worked in Norway and was amazed by the way that humans had used any flat or farmable land. Their resourcefulness is outstanding in such an environment. I look forward to more posts.
Thanks very much, Terry. Yes; having travelled a fair bit in Norway now, the often difficult land, in terms of human usage, is remarkably well used and the place is still very beautiful indeed.
I was trying to persuade a company for which I run workshops to schedule Lofoten Islands. This would have given me excuse to reconnoitre and at least a couple of visits. Now that I’ve seen your splendid images, I am even sorrier that I didn’t manage to convince them. And now that I am off to the other side of the world, it will be a little while before I manage to get there. Although I now have realistic expectations of Tasmania as consolation.
Splendid images, as I said. Serenity in nicely balanced compositions with limited, duotone-type colour palette. All juxtaposed against vivid metaphor and analogy in the writing.
That would indeed have been an excellent wheeze ;-) Shame it didn’t come off. As you say, Lofoten will be a rather long way away soon :-\ Still, Tasmania is reputedly an entirely excellent place, and images from there certainly show it as such – so it’s a very different, but excellent, consolation.
I must go and search out my inadvertent use of vivid metaphor in the article now! Thanks very much for the comment.
Vivid analogy, strictly speaking.
Having just returned from Tromso, i dearly wish I had made the trip to Lofoten, but on the basis that I already want to go back to Tromso the fuel for a return trip is well and truly fired up. Terrific photographs Mike.
Thanks – glad you like them. I’m delighted to have provoked an even stronger ‘need’ to return to that part of the World then ;-) I’m sure I’ll be going back, and possibly a bit further north to Senja too. You obviously had some excellent aurora sightings up there (and that Black Mountain shot is really excellent!). Thanks for the comment.
[…] Post navigation ← Previous […]
Wonderful set of images and write up about Lofoten. I love that place and was disappointed we didn’t stay there on my recent trip. It was for a good reason though, a lack of snow! Hence the trip to Sweden. I hope to return one day. Great blog Mike.
Thanks very much Joe, very kind. I think I’d be inclined to head north if there was no snow too, and your resulting aurora shots were very special as a result! As you say, it’s a special place, and really unique, at least in my experience.
Terrific and a great set of images. It has to be on the to-visit list!
Thanks very much, David. It should be on the list, yes: it’s on mine, and I’ve only just got back!
[…] Locations for photography: Lofoten (preface) AND Locations for photography: the Lofoten Islands, Norway […]
Hello Mike, I stumbled upon your Norway images just by accident. Loverly work. Im just back from Lofoten myself. So i was very interested in your vision and thoughts. I spent a few weeks there in March this year. Just a magic place. Amazing weather and wind, OMG! Your post is very well written and helpful. I’ll share it on Twitter if thats ok. I’ll also RSS to your blog so I can follow your posts. Best regards, Steve
PS: not sure if you get my contact details in comments, but im here: http://www.lightinframeblog.com
Hello Steve, thanks for the comment and glad you like the work! It really is a great place isn’t it. I shall have a look at your site later today. ‘A few weeks’ sounds good; I only had one :-\ Still, good excuse to return someday in my case. From what I heard, there was some vastly changeable weather there in March so I’m sure you saw a good variety of conditions?
Yes, please do share on Twitter – I appreciate it.
Hey – that’s a great shot of Olstind you have as your Twitter background! Very nice.
[…] I think I said in reference to Lofoten earlier this year, if you can, go […]
Great article. Came across it while doing a bit of location research for my upcoming trip to Lofoten. I’ll be shooting for a full week secretly hoping that the sun, moon, and the aurora will cooperate. :) I’m considering a series of night sessions (going out in the early afternoon and finishing after sunrise). Now that doesn’t work so well with staying in hotels or cabins. How did you manage sleep during your visit?
Thanks Andy; glad it was useful!
I was staying in a private guest house, so warm and snug every night ;-) That said, having now been there and seen what the weather can do, I would say that staying out all night would be entirely viable, but you’d need to be prepared for ‘serious weather’, or be very sure of the forecast. For context, I’ve done a lot of alpine mountaineering and slept high on glaciers, occasionally in bad weather. On a couple of nights the weather in Lofoten turned from benign-but-very-cold to severe pretty quickly, meaning double digit Celsius below zero with winds over 25mph and heavy snow (February). In those conditions, you’d certainly need down head-to-toe (or lots of fleece), waterproof layer and ideally a sleeping bag and bivvy bag if it gets too severe (or a way to abort the night-trip, such as being fairly close to your vehicle!). Of course, if you’re well kitted out and near the car, you can always give up, the only issue there being that whilst road clearance is excellent, they won’t be doing it in the middle of the night, so driving back to wherever might not be an option, whilst sitting in the car might ;-)
As I say, I’d do it; just be aware of the weather and your ‘get out of here’ plan.
Hey Mike, just a little heads up :)
I went to Lofoten the second time in February and just released a short film about the roadtrip we took. You are mentioned in the closing credits because you are one of the guys who inspired me to head North.
Thanks very much for the mention, and I’m really pleased to have inspired your trip. I’m about to watch it now and I’m already wishing I could have driven there!
Really lovely work in the film. I’d certainly find that sufficiently inspiring to be looking at getting myself to Lofoten, had I not been there. In fact, having just watched the film twice, I’m rather tempted to make my way back there. Very fine piece of film indeed, and you had some great snow conditions; just right I’d say.
I urge anyone reading this to watch the film.